Proper 13 July 31, 2016 Community Christian Church
Roger Ray, pastor “Freedom from Greed”
Luke 12:13-15 Someone in the crowd said
to him, "Teacher, tell my brother to divide the family inheritance with
me."
But he said to him, "Friend, who set me to be a judge or arbitrator over you?" And he said to them, "Take care! Be on your guard against all kinds of greed; for one's life does not consist in the abundance of possessions."
But he said to him, "Friend, who set me to be a judge or arbitrator over you?" And he said to them, "Take care! Be on your guard against all kinds of greed; for one's life does not consist in the abundance of possessions."
There is a dance we do
when someone dies. Ministers learn the steps to this dance pretty early on in
our careers. Whether the death is sudden or long expected, there is the meeting
with the immediate family, the trip to the funeral home to plan the visitation
and memorial. Then things shift into high gear for me as I plan the music for
the service, write a eulogy and a liturgy and then ride the current of events
from visitation to the service. There is most often a processional to the
graveyard. A graveside service and then the awkward lingering around the grave
as people talk and have to find a way to politely leave.
What comes next in almost
every event is a meal. Now, I’m clearly a man who has never been afraid to eat
but if ever there was a time that I could skip a meal… it is this one. Sadness,
grief, the rituals of death just don’t gin up much of an appetite for me but
the preacher is expected to be there, to say the blessing, and to be available
to those who might want to talk about something religious which, in my
experience is usually precisely no one.
The conversation that
does seem to happen fairly often is one that I wish that I could miss. It is the “who gets what?” conversation.
An old gentleman in my
student parish passed away without any children of his own so his estate was to
be divided among his several nieces and nephews. The financial part he had
dealt with in his will but his large house full of valuable antiques and art
were left to the family to divide equitably.
With a glass of ice tea
on the floor between my feet and a paper plate perched precariously on my
knees, the niece sitting next to me produced several copies of a list of things
she wanted from Uncle’s house and passed them around to her several blood kin
competitors. The list, evidently, named virtually every valuable thing that
Uncle John owned.
My masters and doctorate
in pastoral counseling did not prepare me for the conversation that ensued.
Which, lucky for me did not take the turn of the conversation Linda just read
to us from Luke chapter 12 when a man turned to Jesus and asked him to
arbitrate the division of an estate.
That incident was about
30 years ago and I’m guessing that it remains the only time when I surrendered
a plate full of fried chicken and headed for the back door to slip away quietly.
We don’t know much about
the actual historical Jesus with any level of confidence but among the passages
of the canonical gospels that most scholars seem to give an approving nod, are
these verses that have Jesus showing either disdain or indifference towards
money and possessions.
The most famous of these
sayings, found in all three of the synoptics, is the one where Jesus says that
it is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for a rich
person to enter the Kingdom of God…. Simultaneously dissing rich people and
making generations of large church pastors spin like tops trying to explain
that Jesus didn’t actually mean what he very plainly said in emphatic
exaggeration.
But there are also
interesting and more subtle examples in the gospels, such as the fact that
Judas was said to be the one who carried the common purse, making him suspect
of both stealing from the kitty and simply being guilty by association,
compounded by the 30 pieces of silver he was paid for betraying Jesus in the
end.
I also like the fact that
when Jesus was asked about paying taxes to Rome, he not only told them to give
to Caesar what is Caesar’s but it is also clear that he had to ask someone to
show him a piece of money because he didn’t carry any money. Suggesting that it
just never touched his hands.
And in an account that is
surely apocryphal, in the 17th Chapter of Matthew, Jesus is asked
about paying the temple tax and he tells Peter to go cast a fishing line in the
lake and the first fish he catches will have a 4 drachma coin in its mouth
which he tells Peter to use to pay the temple tax for the two of them. You virtually never hear a sermon about that
text and I wouldn’t be surprised if most of you have never heard of it because
it is embarrassingly obvious that it is fictional but the more important point
is to wonder why the gospel writers would create this almost silly fictional
miracle story.
Matthew wanted to drive
home the point that Jesus’ indifference towards money was so profound that he
didn’t have any, didn’t need any, and didn’t want any and would even pull off a
miracle to avoid the whole scene of buying and selling, taxing and paying
taxes, of ownership and conflict over ownership.
The gospels’ portrayal of
Jesus as being totally free of possessions, even to the point of telling a
prospective disciple that he literally was more poor than a fox who had a den
or a bird who had a nest because he literally didn’t own a place to lay his
head at night, inspired the whole ascetic monastic tradition of taking a vow of
poverty.
I have known a lot of
monks. I wrote my doctoral dissertation on monastic spirituality. I have lived
in monastic houses for retreats quite often and will be a guest at Gethsemani
in Kentucky in just another week. I admire the life of the brothers who have
pledged themselves to this simple life but it deserves to be said that they
live in a big house with their own room where they are assured food in their
refectory every day and even medical care in their in their infirmary and a
place to retire in the community.
I assure you, you would
not find the monk’s cell all that inviting, nor would you relish the vegetarian
diet they maintain, not to mention their habit of rising for corporate prayer
every day at 3:15 a.m. and coming back for mass at 6. Trappists observe a
general rule of silence, not as a vow anymore but more as an awareness that
anything you would say about being awakened at that hour every day would not
bear being repeated in a religious house.
But the brothers have
neither a spouse nor children. They do not worry about passing along family
heirlooms to another generation or about making sure that their grandchildren
get an education. Even Jesus, as he is portrayed in scripture, did not have a
spouse or children and could count on the generosity of others who did give him
a place to lay his head and food to eat.
The extremity of the
moral rejection of money and possessions in the gospels, and the remarkable
example set by monks who embrace a life of poverty and chastity, stand as the
other end of the spectrum from the messages with which we are bombarded every
day.
This is the Sunday paper
for today. We call it a newspaper but by sheer volume, there is at least ten
times as much print trying to make you want to buy something as there is news.
Even in ancient times people had a natural appetite for nice things, for
jewelry, fine pottery, comfortable furniture, and a larger and safer house.
Modernity has taken that natural appetite and basically covered it in cocaine,
addicting our culture to bigger, more, nicer, more attractive, more
comfortable, more ego enhancing, more senses pleasing cars, homes, clothes,
shoes, jewelry, vacations, and foods.
The mere presence of the
lottery in nearly every convenience store and gas station in our country speaks
to our fantasy of being unimaginably rich, and our greed for possessions has
spawned an entire reality TV universe about hoarding, storage lockers, and
treasure hunts. We can easily say that the cases of hoarding we see on TV and
which many of us have seen in our family or in neighbors, is certainly sick.
When we see someone who
is much worse than we are, we breathe a sigh of relief. But I can tell you that
most of us while we may not have the flu, we have a little bit of fever.
During my brief stint as
a Hospice Chaplain, when I was going into several homes of patients in their
last months of life, I was often just blown away by how much stuff was stacked
up in their homes. At the end of the day, I regularly would decompress by going
through my own home, opening every closet door, every cabinet and drawer,
looking for things that I could throw away.
I suspect that everyone
here could go home today and fill their trash dumpster with things that you
have stored that you have not used for years and never will use again….there is
just something difficult about giving away or throwing away something that you
paid for, or that you are used to seeing, or that you inherited. Things start
to literally own you.
I spend so little time at
my home that I could easily downsize into a house half the size of my current
home but where would I put all of my stuff?
An honest read of the
gospels asks us all to make a conscious decision to take control of our
appetites, to not give into the constant drum beat of TV commercials, magazine
ads, internet pop ups, and product placement in movies. We need to, for both
economic and environmental reasons, be aware that how we live and consume can
either create poverty or alleviate suffering.
We need to be even
smarter than those first century Palestinians who could hardly have hurt the
earth if they wanted to. We can destroy our environment simply through
consumption, and not just by burning fossil fuels and exhausting limited
resources, simply choosing to eat beef so often is creating more environmental
hazards than our decision to drive gas guzzling SUVs. Methane from cows is
doing more damage than the exhaust from all of the cars on the road.
Learning to consume less,
to conserve energy, to eat with greater awareness of how our choices affect the
planet and can create hunger in other places, is a part of what it means to
lead a meaningful spiritual life.
I am not suggesting that
you try to live like Jesus, or like a Trappist monk, I’m just saying that we
need to be aware of their example and why you would think that their choices
are extreme, you know that the other end of the spectrum is sick and you would
not hesitate for a moment to call it that. So it is up to each of us to decide
how sick or how healthy that we really want to be… how deep into the consumer
culture do we want to bury ourselves, and how simply can we learn to live in
freedom from being owned by the things that we have bought.
It isn’t about guilt, it
is about health. It isn’t about a religious obligation, it is about find a sane
balance that allows you to have a decent life while leaving enough of the
world’s goods for everyone else to have a decent life.
The coat in your closet
that you will never wear belongs to someone who doesn’t have one. The shoes you
have stored that you do not need, belong to someone who has no shoes. And the
air you foul, the grain and water you waste, to make your next hamburger very
well may belong to someone who is waiting for bread and a drink of water. All I
am asking you to do is to consciously take charge of your choices and stop
letting advertising do it for you.