Sunday, September 20, 2020

Politics of Food

 

The Politics of Food    Sept. 20, 2020     Dr. Roger Ray, pastor

click here to see the video

NYT, Aug. 2, 2016,   GENE BAUR  President and Co-founder Farm Sanctuary

What we eat is one of our most important decisions every day. Our food can either promote health, or it can make us sick. Agriculture can contribute to vibrant, healthy communities, or it can undermine them. Farmers can use scarce natural resources responsibly, or they can squander and deplete them.

Unfortunately, American farm policies have enabled a harmful system to take root. It doesn’t have to be this way. As consumers become more concerned about our broken food system, they are voting with their dollars. There is growing demand for organic produce, and farmers markets are spreading along with community gardens.

This is what my breakfast plate often looks like. I love having fruit for breakfast and I have a special fondness for melons and strawberries. I love it so much, that if I don’t have it for breakfast, I am likely to have it for lunch or dinner. But as common place as this may look to you and me, my grandparents would have never seen a plate like this. In fact, they would have gone to their graves believing that such a thing would not have been impossible. Do you know why?

 

A picture containing cup, food, table, coffee

Description automatically generatedBecause strawberries grow in the early spring, and watermelon and cantaloupe are picked in late summer. When I was young, local grocery stores would advertise on billboards when blueberries were in, when peaches were ripe, and when it was time for the apple harvest. Now, if Starbucks didn’t try to put pumpkin in coffee every October, a violation of nature, if you asked me, we wouldn’t have any sense of growing seasons for anything.

My grandparents were farmers. My parents grew, canned or froze most of the vegetables we ate year-round. I am afraid that I have reduced my family’s agricultural heritage to a purely symbolic backyard garden that produces only a fraction of the food that I eat and, my fear is that even if she wanted to keep up the family heritage, my daughter wouldn’t know which end of a tomato plant goes in the ground. While the pandemic has reacquainted many of us with that tiled room in the house where there are machines that make things hot and keeps other things cold, we have become increasingly disconnected from where we get our food.

 

I have several friends who have chickens and while they gleefully gather and share eggs, none of them actually eat their chickens. They give them names and eventually, they become the keepers of an old chickens’ retirement home because they couldn’t imagine participating in the barbarism that makes wings and tenders possible. And, I’ll add, I’m right there with them. I am not eager to become a vegetarian but if the choice was between a forever salad bar or actually butchering my own meat, then I’m afraid that I would have to stick to rabbit food.

If I may tax your memory and possibly our friendship, last month I gave a talk about the five things that a large group of Danish scholars had published that needed to be changed in a post covid world. One of them, that I told you I would be returning to, is about agriculture, not so much creating a new form of agriculture as going back to an older form of agriculture that was less taxing on the earth, better for the environment globally, and a lot better for our health generally.

 

The family farms I grew up around, almost all had a combination of beef and dairy cattle, chickens and pigs, and they grew corn, beans, potatoes, and the hay and alfalfa fed to their livestock. Crop rotation and being able to feed the livestock the excesses of the agriculture of the farm, kept anything from being driven very far and continually refreshed the earth.

 

To put strawberries and watermelon on the same plate and to do so very nearly 12 months out of the year means that I am not only not buying my produce locally, I’m not even getting most of it off of this continent. Fifty years ago, the only thing in our kitchens that had come from a thousand miles away was our coffee and bananas, now, well, we don’t all shop the same way in the same places, but I would hazard a guess that most of us don’t have more than a fraction of our fresh food from Missouri and only a small percentage from the United States.

My nutritionist friends tell me that we should try to eat whole foods but if we must eat packaged foods to make sure that we never eat anything with more than five ingredients and none that you can’t pronounce. But the marriage of modern farming to capitalist industries has given us even something as healthy sounding as Sun Chips and Whole Wheat Bread with more than 20 ingredients in them, many of which I cannot pronounce but one of the secret words, in almost every case, translates into sugar.

A large air plane on a green field

Description automatically generatedCorporate farming has wiped out the diverse family farms in order to produce single crops as far as the eye can see of soy beans, corn, wheat, sorghum, rice, and potatoes which demands more chemical fertilizers, pesticides, and gasoline to produce.

USDA Doesn't Follow its Own Advice on Dietary Guidelines – Eat Drink Better

Again, even this reimagined food pyramid would not be endorsed by most nutritionists who want for us to eat many more green vegetables and almost no grains or dairy, and much less of the high carbohydrate root vegetables. But even still, if we should have only small servings of meat and dairy, why does most of our federal agricultural subsidies go to meat and dairy? If we should largely avoid grains and completely eschew sugars, why is most of the rest of the budget going to those crops? If we are supposed to eat more fruits and green vegetables, why is less than 1% of our government spending in agriculture devoted to what we are supposed to eat the most?

 

It is a complicated issue. You can’t blame farmers for growing the crops where they stand to gain the most profit but you can blame a government that has allowed lobbyists and special interests to grab hundreds of billions of dollars every year to make the foods that will kill us the most affordable and easy foods available to us.

Many of us have volunteered in our local food pantries that serves the most food insecure families in our communities for decades but I have to tell you, the more I have learned about nutrition and processed foods, the more guilty I have felt about my involvement in this ministry that gives the poor such a carbohydrate rich diet that while we may be preventing hunger, we are certainly helping to cause cancer and type 2 diabetes. The poor eat the worst foods and because they eat what they can afford, they have the worst health outcomes and highest medical bills. It is literally insane.

 

Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes: GLP-1 Receptor AgonistsThis is a touchy topic for me as I am obviously terribly overweight. I would remind our viewers that the camera notoriously adds 15 lbs. but I have to confess that the other 85 extra pounds is pretty much on me. In fact, one snarky comedian recently said that we should stop talking about type 1 and type 2 diabetes and just call them what they are, “pretty much not my fault diabetes” and “yeah, pretty much my fault diabetes.”

This chart shows the growth of type 2 diabetes in our nation over the past 60 years. We get richer, we have better health care, and the rate of diabetes in adults has gone from half of one percent to almost 10% . . . that’s not natural, in fact, it is specifically unnatural. It is a direct product of bad food, and way too much of it!

Asia had almost no diabetes and no heart disease until the last 30 years when we exported Kentucky Fried Chicken, Pizza Hut, and McDonalds to Asia. The British tried to kill them with opium, then it looked like we would kill them with Philip Morris tobacco products, but it looks like the real villains are Col. Sanders and Ronald McDonald.

 

Just as capitalism has not been a friendly force in healthcare, it is possibly even worse in determining what we eat. There is a very powerful influence of the marketplace on our politics and both of them seem to exercise power over our food supply.

I was approached several years ago by one of the founding members of Jesus Seminar who asked me to write a book with him about the politics of food in the New Testament. The project never made it into print, but I spent years thinking about the very odd New Testament story found in Mark and Matthew about a birthday party for Herod. I can never decide if the gospel writers were sufficiently sophisticated to intentionally use the metaphors in their stories as literary devices or if they just immerged unintentionally out of their unconscious, but this narrative is full of images of power and poverty.

 

There was a lot of palace intrigue in the messed up family history of marriages in Herod’s family, but his wife had a daughter from a previous marriage whom she had dance at the party, the implication being that it was a very sexy dance that put the drunken king off his guard and he offered to give her anything she wanted. Her mother told her to ask for the head of the imprisoned prophet, John the Baptist.

 

 But, again, reading the text from Mark 6 very closely, the girl’s mother tells her to ask for the head of John the Baptist but the girl goes before the king and very specifically says, “I want you to give me right now the head of John the Baptist on a platter.” They are at a party, what is brought out on a platter? Food, right?

Please forgive me for being so very graphic but, while you may think of David presenting the head of the Philistine warrior, Goliath, or the ancient practice of putting the heads of criminals or national enemies on a spike in public, but a head on a platter – that’s different and I can’t let go of the apparent metaphor that while the young girl was being treated as an object of lust, even still, she was a member of the royal family and she could treat the poor and vulnerable as if they were a plate of French fries. Not literally, but certainly figuratively, economically, politically, the rich have always eaten the poor.

 

In 1729, during the great Potato Famine, in Ireland, Jonathan Swift wrote a satirical piece called “A modest proposal,” which is the basis of the song that Sean is going to sing in a moment. Swift suggested that the poor Irish sell their children as food to the well-heeled English. His intent was to shame the moral indifference of the English towards the Irish which, historically, didn’t seem to actually work very well.

 

You could wish that farmers could just decide that they are going to throw profits to the wind and only grow healthy foods in an organic way but as much as farming may be a cultural lifestyle, it isn’t a hobby for very many people. It has to be profitable. The whole reason that we have a federal government with a tax system and departments that hand out subsidies is to manage desirable outcomes.

 

The problem is, with our system of government, Herod keeps lustily leaning towards Herodias’ bare bosom and telling her that she can have whatever she wants. And what she always wants is the head of the poor on a platter.

 

We the people, in order to form a more perfect union, need to give voice to what the poor need to say before the axe is laid to their necks. We can’t do it all at once without upsetting the economic apple cart, but we know where we need to go and we can start making changes with every year’s budget, so that we shrink the subsidies of meat, dairy, rice, corn, soy, sugar, potatoes, and wheat, and we start subsidizing green vegetables, fruits, and other organically grown foods. And, yes, that will make many foods more expensive, but it will lower our medical bills by very much more and give us longer lives.

 

Our politicians, because they owe their jobs to the donations from lobbyists, cannot tear their eyes off of the enchanting Herodias. We need to help her to put her shirt back on and go sit down. Our government must work for us and right now they are poisoning us and that must stop. They will not do it on their own. They will only do it if we insist on it, and we can do that in the ballot box or we can do that in the streets but either way, allowing politics and profit to set the table for us has us continually eating the poor and that, my friends, really must stop.