Sunday, October 6, 2019

“Drugs, Race, and Prisons”

“Drugs, Race, and Prisons” Oct. 5, 2019    Dr. Roger Ray, pastor
John Ehrlichman as quoted in Harper’s, April 2016 The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I’m saying? We knew we couldn’t make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders, raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did.”

Pie chart showing the number of people locked up on a given day in the United States by facility type and the underlying offense using the newest data available in March 2019.
Incarceration rates per 100,000 (Source: “The Growth of Incarceration in the United States: Exploring Causes and Consequences,” The National Research Council, 2014.)If you will allow me to channel my inner Steve Rattner this morning, I need to start off with a few charts. You don’t see them, you may think that you don’t know them, it may have never happened to you but in America today, we have about 2 million people in jails and prisons and another 9 million on some kind of supervised parole. This is a stunning figure, especially when you compare the United States to other western nations where you can see that as a percentage of population, we have almost no rivals, with even Russia coming in a distant second.
Of the western democracies with whom we would like to associate ourselves, England, France, Canada, Sweden, Finland, we have between 5 and 12 times as many people in prison per capita. At 2 million people, our inmate population is virtually a nation within a nation. 

This stunning fact demands an explanation. Why? Why do we incarcerate so many people? The best way that I know to explain it is to employ that line made so famous in the 1976 film about the Watergate scandal, “Follow the money.” Or, in this case, it may be about money, and power, or, more accurately, it is about money, power, racism, classism, and irrational prejudice. 
I find it amazing that he was willing to admit it in an interview, but I am not the least bit shocked by that facts revealed by Nixon administration advisor, John Ehrlichman, in a 2016 interview, that the Nixon administration increased the criminal sentences for marijuana and heroin, not because they really wanted to fight a drug war but because marijuana was a drug common among young Vietnam War protestors and heroin was associated with the black community that was finally finding a voice and political clout in the Civil Rights movement.

You cannot even imagine Richard Nixon being concerned about drug abuse, but, as Ehrlichman said, he considered blacks and war protestors as his domestic enemies, and he would do anything to destroy them. 
Increasing punishment for drug possession and distribution allowed them to break up meetings, jail leaders, and generally harass and threaten Nixon’s perceived enemies. Ehrlichman concludes the interview saying, Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did.”

This is not Stalin’s Russia, this is not Mao’s China, this is our America…sweet land of liberty, the home of the free and the brave, the greatest Democracy since ancient Greece. I hope that you know that I take no pleasure in either revealing or rehearsing these facts. Here is the naked, unavoidable, and painful truth: the government of the United States, in successive administrations, has lied to the population to gain their acquiescence to policies that result in the oppression and imprisoning of minorities and dissidents. They do this in many ways but one of the most insidious and dishonest is the use of drug charges. 

Now, let’s be very honest about this. Heroin is a scourge. It is a highly addictive yet relatively cheap and available drug that is killing tens of thousands of people. If making it illegal and criminally charging those who manufacture, distribute, and use it would wipe it off the face of the earth, I would feel differently. But what we know for a fact is that 50 years of a war on drugs has failed entirely and our policies have ruined the lives of millions, cost us billions in tax dollars, and has, almost single handedly, broken up minority families and kept the sons and daughters of 19thcentury slaves locked in chaos and poverty. 

The so called “War on Drugs” has utterly failed. Almost every western democracy has realized that addiction is not a crime, it is medical problem. It does not call for incarceration, it calls for treatment. Why does the United States persist in doing what we have clearly seen for 50 years is a disastrous failure?
Image result for war on drugs failedBecause it has only be a disastrous failure if your goal was to eradicate drug use. If your goal is to make money, it has been a colossal success. Just the Mexican drug cartels make over a half a trillion dollars in the United States every year and while numbers like that are hard to imagine, let me just say, by contrast, that is more than Walmart . . . and Walmart is everywhere and is the largest legal employer in America. So the industry is huge, and the profits don’t stay in the hands of drugs dealers. Our banking system gets to launder all of that money and law enforcement depends on the drug trade to fatten their budgets. 

If you have not spent time around a county jail, that last point might easily pass you by but let me drill down on this for just a moment:
Of the 2 million Americans in jails and prisons, a half a million of those are being held in local jails awaiting trial or sentencing. You have heard about all of the overcrowding at our relatively new county jail here, and that overcrowding is largely due to our sheriff agreeing to keep people awaiting a federal trial, many of whom are not a flight risk, but they are in jail before sentencing for . . . wait for it, . . . wait for it, . . . they couldn’t afford bail. And because they are too poor to afford bail, And because they are too poor to pay for it, tax payers are forced to pay about $50,000 per prisoner per year, to keep them in jail. 

And those fees pay for law enforcement salaries, construction, utilities, food, clothing, supplies, and transportation. If this obscenity doesn’t make you mad as hell then you might have a cold hard place where your heart was supposed to be but if you need a little more of a nudge in that direction, let me tell you something else about this situation:
Image result for prison commissary chargesThey take these half a million people, shove them into overcrowded cages and then they don’t provide many of the basics of life. They make nearly $2 billion every year by selling personal items, phone privileges, and snacks to inmates. They use for profit phone systems that charge the inmate several dollars to make a phone call. A phone card at the Greene County jail costs $60 and is good for about five calls at $16 each. Why do they charge so much? Because they can.

And if you think that this is a problem that exists mostly in more populated states, you should know, Missouri is one of the worst. Our incarceration rate is 20% higher than the USA on average and, of course, 10x to 20x the incarceration rate in most of western Europe.  

But the money trail doesn’t end there. Prison labor is another way to make a profit off of mass incarceration. We have more black men incarcerated now than we ever had slaves in 19thcentury America, and when you can pay them about 25 cents an hour to work, we have not really abolished slavery in America, have we? Prisoners ironically make a lot of military and police garments and bullet-proof protective gear. They make McDonalds uniforms and, it may come as a surprise to many of you, but whatever Victoria’s other secrets may be, the one she wouldn’t want you to know is that some of their unmentionables are manufactured in prison labor camps for pennies per panties. 

The “why” of America’s mass incarceration is almost entirely a “follow the money” explanation. Explaining how we do it has a lot to do with power.

I made several attempts to communicate with Missouri’s last democratic senator, Claire McCaskill and I can say that I struck out every time. Claire political posture was basically, “I’m better than the Republican alternative,” and, low and behold: that was true. But like a lot of politicians, Claire rose to political prominence as a prosecutor and so, selling herself to the voting public as being tough on crime was a well-worn path. When I tried to talk to her or her staffers about the absurdity of the size of our prison population and begged for them to look at shortening sentences for non-violent crimes, the reply was always a flat-footed response about political realities . . . no politician wins votes by showing sympathy for criminals. 

If we ask ourselves, “Who should be in prison and how long should they be there?” I guarantee you that your answers would be much more compassionate than the reality we see in our very broken judicial system. 
One in five inmates are locked up for drug charges. Two-thirds of our 2 million nation of inmates are locked up for non-violent crimes. 

I have sat in courtrooms with parents of young men being sentenced for crimes such as possession of child pornography…. Not for rape, not for child abduction, not for producing or selling or even buying child porn, but for being a stupidly curious young man and looking at it on line, and they will be sentenced to ten or fifteen years in a federal prison. Child pornography is illegal in most countries but in most of Europe, the maximum sentence is five years. In the United States, we have grown our prison population, largely, by adding years and years onto the sentences of those convicted of a crime. 

This goes to the character of America. Do we put people in prison in order to reform them? To change their criminal ways and help them to become better people or do we imprison them for some kind of social revenge? Do we want a pound of flesh from the inmate or do we want to protect society from criminals while helping the criminal to be reformed? 
By treating prisoners as being subhuman, literally exposing them to overcrowding and degradation that would not be allowed at an animal shelter for stray dogs and cats, we keep our prisons full by teaching inmates to be criminals so that they re-offend and return to prison life. 

More than half of the inmates in America will return to jail after their release, compare that to Scandinavian countries, where most prisons offer much better living conditions and many more personal freedoms, so that even though being in prison is not nearly so harsh, their recidivism rate is less than half of ours. Here is the formula, in countries with harsh and punitive prison systems, most people become hardened criminals in prison, and they will come back. In countries where prisoners are treated respectfully and given educational and recreational opportunities, they return to society and live productive lives. Why isn’t this obvious to everyone?

I must thank you for being patient with me today as I have flipped through charts and statistics about the injustice of our justice system, but I cannot leave this topic without saying something about race. 
It is never entirely accurate to globalize from any one case but the contrast between the white actress, Felicity Huffman, and the black homeless mother, Tanya McDowell is irresistible. Huffman bribed and SAT test administrator $15,000 to cheat on her daughter’s test to get her into a better school. She was found guilty and was sentenced to 2 weeks in a comfy jail. Tanya McDowell used her father’s address to register her six-year-old son in a better school than he would have gone to from the homeless shelter and she was sentenced to 5 years in prison. Now, don’t get me wrong: Felicity Huffman paid a $15,000 bribe but when she was sentenced to two weeks in jail, she also had to pay a $30,000 fine. Honestly, that seems about right to me. We have too many people in jail for way too long and I think that given the public humiliation, criminal record, spending a few days in jail and taking a financial hit is punishment enough.

It is Tanya McDowell’s case that reeks of racism. If they found her kid didn’t deserve to be registered in the school where his grandfather lived, then, I suppose you could move him to another school. But in what universe is it a crime for a poor mother to try to get her kid into a better school? A five-year sentence for this? Am I the only one here who thinks that she should be applauded for taking action to get her kid into a better school? The problem here is that Felicity Huffman had too much money and way too much sense of white privilege and Tanya McDowell was poor, desperate, and doing what she could. Call me a rebel, but justice here does not include any criminal charge for Tanya, and far from jail time, I think Felicity Huffman should have paid her $30,000 fine to Tanya McDowell so that woman could rent an apartment in a good school system. That’s just my opinion . . . it just so happens that I am right. 

The ACLU reports that, on average, a black person’s prison sentence is 20% longer than a white person’s who committed the same crime. 
But as bad as that is, the larger fact that is more difficult to quantify is that Latino, Native American, and black people are more likely to be apprehended, convicted, and incarcerated than are white people. One famous example is the way in which Billie Holiday and Judy Garland were treated when they were both addicted to heroin.

Judy Garland’s doctor told her to take longer vacations and spend more time with family and friends, which, ironically, is the best way to treat addiction. Billie Holiday was put in jail and handcuffed to a bed, and that is where she died.
Look, James Taylor was a heroin addict… do you think of him as a criminal? Sweet Baby James? Is it a weak-minded person who sang “I’ve Seen Fire and I’ve Seen Rain?” If James Taylor were black, he would probably be dead now and that is the issue about race and drugs in America.
Forty-five years ago, when Nixon turned Johnson’s war on poverty into a war on the poor by jacking up laws to criminalize drug use this nation was sold a lie. And you have it straight from the mouth of a Nixon administration advisor, John Ehrlichman, who said, “Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did.”
Let me sum up by saying that we need to stop thinking of addiction as a crime and start treating it like the medical problem that it is. And I think that we need to put protections in place to make sure that justice is blind to race and to class. And furthermore, I think that we need to turn the tables and put the justice system on trial. Justices, prosecutors, and politicians have transferred billions of dollars and grabbed corporate and political power by abusing minorities, the poor, and the vulnerable. We need to shorten prison sentences and use prisons to reform rather than to get revenge. We need to release most of our prisoners by using prisons only for people who represent a real threat to society. 

People who smoke pot or register their kid in a better school district are not a threat to you or your rights.
Image result for kavanaugh
My modest suggestion is that we put rapists in prison rather than on the bench.