Sunday, November 5, 2017

"Preserving Democracy”    Nov. 5, 2017     Roger Ray, pastor   
   click here to see the video            
As democracy is perfected, the office of president represents, more and more closely, the inner soul of the people. On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart’s desire at last and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron.” — H. L. Mencken

One year prior to the 2018 mid-term elections, registered voters in Missouri received this postcard in the mail telling them that the next time they go to the polls that they will have to show a government issued photo-id. For those of us who drive cars, this is not likely to be much of a personal affront. If you own a car you have a driver’s license that is always on your person anyway so it won’t noticeably slow you down at the polls.

The larger issue here is voter suppression. The formula is very simple: large voter turnout favors Democrats and low voter turnout favors Republicans. In a true democracy, everyone gets to vote. Who is everyone? In the early days of our nation, “everyone” meant “white men.” In 1870, after the Civil War, black men were granted the right to vote though most southern states enacted literacy tests, poll taxes, and other measures to suppress any actual voting by the black population of their states.

Fifty years after black men were given the vote, after years of protests and demonstrations that were often broken up with violence and multiple arrests, women were granted the right to vote in 1920, when our nation was already 150 years old. Voter suppression, especially of black voters, continued right up until the famous protests of the Civil Rights movement in the 1960’s, culminating in the 1965 passage of the Voter Rights Act.

Most of us here today can remember the historic events on the Edmund Pettus Bridge in Selma, Alabama, and the Bloody Sunday in March of 1965 when the police literally opened fire on protestors, state police rode horses into the crowd, indiscriminately beating demonstrators.

It took almost two hundred years to actually give birth to a democracy where everyone could vote. People worked, bled, and died to gain this right to participate in self-governance. I understand that Republicans still want to win elections but they don’t get to win by eroding democracy. They need to develop policies and conduct campaigns that win the most votes. The claim of voter fraud is, itself, a fraud.

Justin Levitt, a professor at Loyola Law School in Los Angeles, conducted a research project to find out how many instances of voter fraud have taken place in US elections. Donald Trump claimed that there were millions of instances of voter fraud in the 2016 presidential election but Levitt’s research turned up only 31 credible cases of voter fraud in all elections, nation-wide, from 2000 to 2014. Folks, that’s between two and three instances of voter fraud per year in all 50 states. And even if his research missed a thousand times as many as he found, you still wouldn’t have enough votes to affect a national election.

There are no real incidents of voter fraud. Still, states are enacting photo ID laws to solve a problem that does not exist. Who does not have a government issued photo ID? People who don’t own cars: the poor, minorities, the disabled, recent immigrants, and urban dwellers. More than 20 million registered voters do not have a photo ID, 20 million people who just happen to fit the demographic of typical Democratic voters.

We’re good people. We are not narcissistically only interested in what affects us directly. We are, or we should be, outraged by anyone’s right to vote being either taken from them or even just seeing millions manipulated into not bothering to jump through the hoops necessary to vote. But let’s imagine for a moment that we are not good people. Selfishly speaking, does voter suppression affect those of us who do have a driver’s license in our pockets at all times? Of course it does, especially if you believe in democracy, if you value our form of government, if you believe in majority rule, and, in fact, if you ever want someone other than a Republican candidate to win.

When 20 million voters who might vote for a progressive candidate are prevented from voting, then my vote is worth significantly less. I care about voter’s rights because they were bought with a price, one-person, one-vote is the bedrock of freedom and democracy and any attempt at diluting democracy is an assault on any patriotic American. It is heartbreaking to think that any political party would stoop so low as to assault the integrity of voting in order to win more elections.

Let me bring this issue down to a concrete application: The state of Wisconsin was one of the first to enact photo ID laws, preventing more than 50,000 citizens from voting in 2016. Donald Trump won the state of Wisconsin by 23,000 votes. It is likely that without the photo ID law, Trump would not have won in Wisconsin and without Wisconsin, he would not have been elected president. So, I hope you can see how important that this issue is.

But, of course, the photo-id requirements is only one way that Republicans are seeking to suppress voter’s rights. They are trying to close voting places, make lines longer, restrict early voting and eliminate weekend voting.
Other nations make election day a national holiday so that everyone is off from work. In America, we always vote on a Tuesday, a work day, so that business owners, managers, the retired, and professionals have no trouble getting to the polls, but hourly workers cannot. If we moved our election days to a Saturday or a Sunday, it would be much more democratic but you almost never hear that idea even being mentioned.

But all of these techniques pale in significance to the real crime of voter fraud: Gerrymandering. This practice of drawing the boundaries of electoral districts to benefit the party that is in power is now over 200 years old. However, with the advent of digital record keeping and the massive data we have on voters and their addresses, Gerrymandering has reached a new zenith.

Both Republicans and Democrats have been guilty of doing it but as the percentage of the population that self identifies as Republicans grows smaller, the remaining Republican controlled state houses are rigging elections far into the future by twisting and turning electoral district lines for no logical reason so far as common interests goes but very intentionally to establish majority Republican districts that can hold onto power for another generation.

Electoral districts are defined on the state level but they affect national elections. It is legal but it shouldn’t be. It amounts, once again, to taking away, not an individual’s right to vote but rather it renders the votes of more than 40% of our citizens, worthless. I don’t want to sound wonkish about this so let me say it simply: If you love democracy, you automatically hate gerrymandering.

And speaking of being wonkish, let me tax your patience for just another five minutes to talk about something that usually goes entirely ignored for four years at a time until we set out to elect a new president. Our founding fathers, for reasons that were fairly disingenuous in the 1770’s but have become absolutely absurd since the invention of the telegraph, built a monster into our constitution called “the electoral college.”

Article 2, section 1, clause 2 creates a way of assigning each state a certain number of electoral college votes based on the population of each state. Originally it provided an extra layer of protection against a direct, one person, one vote, election in which a gullible public might do what H. L. Menken feared, the public could elect an absolute moron. Now that we have elected an absolute moron, even with the Electoral College in place, we need to give it another look.

What is not in the constitution is any suggestion that any state has to award all of their electoral college votes to any one candidate. For example, in the last election, Missouri was allowed 10 electoral college votes. If 60% of the votes cast in Missouri went to Trump, and 40% went to Clinton, then it stands to reason that Trump would get 6 of our votes and Clinton would get 4. Nothing could be more obvious.

It is obvious except for the fact that states don’t do it that way. Most are winner take all. So if you are a democrat in a red state, your presidential vote is worthless before you go to the polls because our president is not elected based on the popular vote. Voting for democrats in deeply red states is a symbolic protest but it has no impact on the election.

It would take an amendment to the constitution to eliminate the electoral college but amendments are almost impossible to pass. But that doesn’t mean that we are stuck with the electoral college. Either a Supreme Court decision or the Congress could mandate that states apportion electoral college delegates based on a proportion of the vote totals…. Creating election by popular vote… sort like is done in every other civilized nation in the world.

The premise of this book is that most of what stands between the America we are now and the greater America we long for just isn’t all that hard to accomplish. Crucial to the preservation of our free democracy is the right of every citizen to vote. We need to encourage everyone to vote their conscience and we need to outlaw gerrymandering and the winner-take-all state practices regarding the electoral college, and these silly voter ID laws that are just another form of poll tax or literacy tests should be eliminated. And we should make voting easier with mail-in ballots, weekend voting, and easier absentee voting, and our election day should be a national holiday.

I would love to get big money out of politics. I would love for us to have enforced campaign periods of no more than three months, and I would love to see prison sentences for candidates who knowingly lie in campaign speeches and ads. Most western democracies already have these practices in place but each of these would be rather more difficult for us to accomplish. “Difficult” doesn’t mean that it shouldn’t be done but, as I have said, the point of this book is to encourage Americans to grab the low hanging fruit of reform immediately.


Progressives should never surrender to despair. American greatness is within our grasp.