Sunday, April 30, 2017

 “Choosing the Right Rather than Choosing the Winner”'
April 30, 2017   Community Christian Church of Springfield, MO
Roger Ray, pastor    

 H. L. Menchen, Treatise on the Gods        
Their prayers always go up for kings, not for rebels and reformers. During the American Revolution, the priests of the established church were almost unanimously loyal to King George, and during the Civil War the clergy of the South remained faithful to the Southern economic system, and to slavery as a part of it. The great religious reformers have never preached the liberation of the masses. Luther, Calvin and John Wesley were all on the side of authority. The Catholic church is for it everywhere today, and more intransigent it is the better the church likes it. Thus the patriotism of a priest is hard to distinguish from the patriotism of a stockbroker. When he is found questioning the established order it usually develops, upon inquiry, that he is also questioning the tenets of his church, and is on his way to heresy.

After enduring nearly nine years of intense public scrutiny and totally unprecedented levels of vitriolic, racist, partisan and sometimes conspiracy theory driven criticism, as the Obama’s prepared to become the first black family in American history to leave public housing so that a white billionaire could move in, Michele Obama endeared herself to the nation by telling reporters that all during their growing up in the White House, she had told her daughters to hold their heads high and to not reply to the criticisms they were witnessing. She said, “When they go low, we go high.”

I trust that I am not alone here when I say that I miss the Obamas terribly. I miss their class, their confident and calm demeanor, and their ability to suffer indignity without reprisal. Good on them. And as a pastor, I can only applaud any examples of civility and respectful language in the midst of heated political discourse.

But I heard one feminist commentator say recently, “With all due respect to Michele Obama, I think that when they go low we need to grab a shovel and bury them.”   
The heated rhetoric of recent years, fueled by social media and right-wing talk radio, and given some credible substance in the 24-hour news channels that give more partisan red meat to their viewers than actual facts is a huge social problem. It makes voters demand virtual insanity out of their legislators which has given us a congress and a senate that is about as useful as giving a bicycle to a fish.

So, sure, civility is called for. We all need to reign in our rhetoric and try hard to speak the truth in love but what our wisdom lesson from H. L. Menchen’s, Treatise on the Gods, is pointing out is that the church, and I can probably very safely add, the synagogue and the mosque, have often chosen symbolic patriotism, civility, and loyalty over the truth. Organized religion may throw roses at the concept of speaking the truth in love but they are much more likely to get the love part right at the expense of the truth.

I certainly don’t agree with all of the conclusions Reza Aslan reached in his very popular book, Zealot, in which he describes the historical Jesus as being a radical, anti-empire, reformer, but I think we can safely agree with the basic premise that Jesus was not killed because he healed the sick, fed the hungry, and taught children to obey their parents, and neighbors to love one another.

If we can deduce anything from the historical clues left as echoes in the first century written accounts, Jesus was executed by the state because he challenged their moral authority, their violent control of the people, and their economic exploitation of the poor.

Please don’t get tired of hearing me say this because as I have been mapping out my sermons for the next three months, I realize that this is a fact that will be standing over a lot of what I plan to say…. In all of modern history, there has really been only one war and that a continuous one…. The war of haves against the have-nots.

And this may be painfully obvious but please give me a moment to spell this out clearly. You can tell the truth about the monetary motivations for modern warfare while still respecting the young men and women who serve in the military. Most recruits for the past 45 years were going into the military out of economic necessity. Low paying jobs and high college tuition drives the children of the poor into military service.

Once inducted, no one is more subjected to daily infusions of propaganda than are these soldiers. The high unemployment in their hometown and the lack of opportunity for higher education that drove them into uniform is driven from their heads as they are repeatedly told that they are answering a high calling of the defense of freedom. Vietnam didn’t threaten our freedom, Korea didn’t threaten our freedom, Iraq, Afghanistan, Yemen, Pakistan, Haiti, Panama, didn’t threaten our freedom. In each case we deployed the children of the poor to go kill the children of the poor in another nation to defend economic interests.

And please don’t try to change the subject to terrorism, if we were concerned about American safety we would outlaw handguns. Terrorists present much less danger to American’s lives than not getting the flu shot.

Again, let me be very clear:  I didn’t say that everyone who enters the military does so for economic reasons. I am sure that there are those who feel drawn to a career in the military for reasons of family heritage, to bolster a future political career, or out of genuine patriotism, but we have a saying in psychology – when you hear hoof beats you think horses and not zebras.

Most of the people we recruit into the military come from rural, poor, families and while their heroism and personal sacrifices are to be applauded, respected, honored, and compensated from health benefits and counseling to a decent retirement – we don’t have to pretend that they are in Afghanistan defending our freedom.

I’m going to come back to the topic of the government’s manipulation of the poor in military adventures over the next few weeks but for today I want to return to this observation that H. L. Menken made nearly a century ago…. That in matters of state, the established church is almost always on the side of power. During the Revolutionary War, most established churches supported the British king. During the Civil War, almost every southern church supported not only the military cause of the South but the institution of slavery as well.

Luther, Calvin, Wesley, all knew which side their bread was buttered on. Right up the later half of the last century, when some Catholic priests in Central and South America were finally siding with the poor in the Liberation Theology movement, most met their deaths with the approving nod of the Vatican itself.
And, frankly, for all the reasons we have to like current pope, if you want to continue to like him, you probably should probe too deeply into what he was doing during the round up of liberation priests in Argentina. There are wonderful exceptions but, in general, the Catholic Church has behaved just as Menken said, in service to whoever was in power.

None other than our nation’s own founding father, Thomas Jefferson, wrote: “In every country and in every age, the priest has been hostile to liberty. He is always in alliance with the despot, abetting his abuses in return for protection of his own.”

We may tend to err on the other side, being always a tad eager to jump on the ethical failings of governments and corporations and it may be that we should accept a certain degree of criticism about how lovingly we articulate the truth…. There are, paradoxically, ways in which we can be so right that we become wrong.

But the one thing that the church, the synagogue, and the mosque must do in this present moment is to clearly and unapologetically tell the truth. Our good friend from the progressive movement in Great Britain, John Churcher stays in touch and just this week forwarded an article to me from a British newspaper that was saying basically what our Senator Elizabeth Warren was saying yesterday about the 100 day mark of the Trump administration.

Both listed the lies, the broken campaign promises, and the thus far failed legislative attempts to ban Muslims from entering our country, to end Obamacare with a huge tax give away to the super-wealthy, and this silly, one page tax reform proposal that would, at best, give hundreds of billions of dollars to the super wealthy and do nothing at all for 98% of wage earners in America. Mix that in with scandal after scandal in the West wing from dealings with Russian spies and conflicts of interest in the business world, and we cannot avoid saying that this is the most inept, corrupt, and dangerously flawed president in modern American history… but both Senator Warren and the Jonathan Freeland article from the Guardian that John sent to me said that the one good thing we can take from these first 100 days is the apparent fact that protest works.

The missteps of the Trump administration have mobilized opposition in ways that we have not lately witnessed in American history and that mobilization has shown itself to be effective in ways that we might not have dared to hope. Freeland concludes: Donald Trump is as bad as we feared: delusional, dangerous, dishonest. But there is another lesson from these 100 days. Even when faced with the greatest menace, resistance is not futile.

When we started this church in 2008 we hired a local fabric artist to make two banners for us that would at least be suggestive of stained glass windows that we would hang in the windowless conference room where we were meeting at the time. This one to my left, the winged lion, is taken from the familiar art depicting the gospel of Mark but rather than a quote from the Bible, we took as our motto a quote from Elie Wiesel’s Nobel Prize speech in which he said that the ethics of the whole of the Hebrew and Christian scriptures could be summed up in a single phrase:  Thou shalt not stand idly by.
Wiesel said then that the holocaust only happened because people who knew better, who had a more sensitive and refined conscience, held their tongues and though hurt and horrified by what happened, said little and did nothing.

That is a mistake that we are resolved never to make again and though we started our church just months before Obama was elected, now, more than ever, our motto must be reaffirmed, we are resolved that we will never stand idly by and watch in silence and inaction in the presence of great social evil.