Do You Do Well To Be Angry?

Proper 20    Sept. 21, 2014
Community Christian Church
Roger Ray, Pastor

Jonah 3:1-5, 10
3The word of the Lord came to Jonah a second time, saying, 2"Get up, go to Nineveh, that great city, and proclaim to it the message that I tell you." 3So Jonah set out and went to Nineveh, according to the word of the Lord. Now Nineveh was an exceedingly large city, a three days' walk across. 4Jonah began to go into the city, going a day's walk. And he cried out, "Forty days more, and Nineveh shall be overthrown!"
5And the people of Nineveh believed God; they proclaimed a fast, and everyone, great and small, put on sackcloth. 10When God saw what they did, how they turned from their evil ways, God changed his mind about the calamity that he had said he would bring upon them; and he did not do it.

The story of Jonah is an Old Testament parable.  It is not intended to describe a historical event.  This short work doesn't tell us about a real person or a real city and, much to many folks disappointment, not even a real whale.  It struggles to tell us something about God and our anger, more specifically, our racism.  And like any well-crafted parable, it is full of irony, humor and dramatic action.

The story is set up this way: a Jewish man is called by God to go and preach in the capital city of Assyria.

It is set in a time when Assyria has destroyed Israel and pretty well messed up Judah and all of their neighbors.  Assyria was practicing that ancient form of warfare that built their national wealth by stealing everything of value from all of their neighbors and enslaving their population.  Assyria had never done anything good for any Jew and had done every outlandish, criminal, reprehensibly violent thing they could do to destroy the Jewish people.

So, this is a very tense set up.  God tells Jonah to go and preach to the people he hated the most.
Now, Biblical scholars agree that this story is not nearly old enough to have been written in those days of Assyrian rule.  It was written much later, two or three hundred years later.  It was written in a time when the tiny little remnant of Jews were trying to rebuilt a scrap of a nation on the ruins left behind after nearly a century of slavery in Babylon.  In those days of reconstruction there was just an awful lot of anger.... they had been bullied, robbed, burned out, sold into slavery and then finally dumped totally vulnerable in a nearly barren land in a city with no walls and very little to eat.

The person who sat down to write Jonah lived among a rag tag bunch of survivors who kept themselves alive by feeding on how much they hated Babylonians, Egyptians, Syrians and just about anyone who didn't look and sound Jewish.  And when people are so certain that their hatred is justified, when they know for a fact that their bloodthirsty prayers are heard by God it is very very difficult to offer an alternative position.

I found myself becoming very provoked a few days ago when I woke up to my usual diet of coffee and news programs and the news channel that I was watching had decided to replay, moment by moment, the original broadcast of their program on Sept. 11, 2001.  I totally understand the desire to remember, to memorialize, to honor those who lost their lives on that horrible day, but what we were being asked to relive was the terror, the confusion, the toxic blending of fear and rage that we all felt when the second plane hit the second tower and all speculations about an accident suddenly ended.  America was under attack.... A sneak attack, a terrorist attack.... Against unarmed civilians who posed no threat to anyone.
And watching that first hour again, that I still remembered very clearly from that Tuesday morning thirteen years ago, I realized that I wasn't really being asked to remember and honor, I was being asked to relive the fear and anger, the desire for revenge.

And I immediately wondered if TV stations in Bagdad replayed coverage from our bombing of Bagdad on March 18, 2003 every year and if they did, would they be memorializing the dead or reminding the people of Iraq that they need to still fear and hate Americans?  You remember where you were on 9-11-2001 but do you remember where you were on March 18, 2003?  Does that illegal and extremely lethal act of war strike you in anything like the same way?


Whoever wrote the book of Jonah wanted to ask that question that I just asked in a somewhat more diplomatic, more empathetic manner. Sometimes, when people are that mad, using a little slap stick humor is the only way to break the ice.  So the story starts with Jonah going the opposite direction from where God wants him to go.  And God causes a great storm to strike the ship at sea.  And even pagan gentiles are getting religion trying to beg God to help them.

They finally throw Jonah overboard into the raging sea and the sea calms down and a giant fish swallows Jonah and swims for three days to deliver him to the shores of Nineveh.


See, everyone in this story is totally obedient to God.... the weather, the sea, the fish, and even pagan sailors but one person is defiant of God's will..... the preacher! Cause, see, he has got a serious mad on.  It is not just that he thought Judaism was that much better than the religion of Assyria or that Judah was just all that much better than any other nation.... it was that he had seen the wreckage, the slaughter.... he knew people who had been killed, enslaved, raped and robbed.  His anger was a righteous anger that doesn't really believe that anyone who disagrees with him can be anything but stupid or evil and probably some of both.

We've recently had this whole debate about Syria going on in the news. Last year John McCain was mad at the president for not arming ISIS because they were fighting against President Assad in Syria.  Now McCain is mad at the president because he is not arming Assad so that he can fight ISIS better.  Which only leads me to wonder why news programs still interview Joh McCain?

There is an element of our government, of our population, that just doesn't want to learn about history, or facts or to see it from perspective other than their own sense of having been wronged.  They are frightened, xenophobic.... They want to feel safe and they want revenge.  That, men and women, is Jonah.

Jonah walks into the middle of this huge monstrous city and delivers a short and pretty sad attempt at a sermon.  He preached a one sentence sermon....One sentence predicting the immanent destruction of the city.  And against all credible odds, the entire city repents.
The storyteller wants us to believe that everyone from the King to the cattle in the field repented!  Best revival in the history of the world!

But, of course, that is part of the irony.  Jonah didn't want them to turn from their evil.  He wanted God to destroy them.  Isn't that God's business?  Destroying evil people?  Doesn't God see the injustice?  Doesn't God become outraged by the mass destruction?  Didn't God see the videos of people being beheaded?  Doesn't God want us to wipe out Nineveh and every city like it?

By the way, our drones also make video recordings.... We could be showing the videos of our execution of thousands of innocent civilians by our own killer flying robots but you never see those videos do you?

Jonah goes up on a ridge over looking the city to watch and see if they'll mess up.... maybe God will go ahead and bomb the city anyway.  You know, it gets hot when you don't have anything but your anger to keep you company.  Jonah is just sitting up there, waiting, watching, and hoping they'll mess up.

In Alcoholics Anonymous they say that anger is the dubious luxury of ordinary people.  It is a luxury because it is an emotion that some people can revel in but recovering alcoholics know that it is a luxury they can't afford.  If they get angry then it won't be long before they also get drunk.  But it is a dubious luxury because even people who don't get drunk don't seem to get much good out of it.  Anger doesn't seem to make people very smart.  It doesn't make them spiritual.
It doesn't make them compassionate or loving and a whole lot of the time it makes them do something really destructive, usually self-destructive. The Big Book of A.A. calls anger poison and it may well be.

But let me return to the Biblical story.  Jonah is sitting on the ridge watching the city and a vine grows up over the little shack where he is sitting and the vine is the only decent thing that has happened to Jonah.... at least the vine offers some shade from the hot sun.  However, just as the weather, the sea, the fish and the pagans are all obedient to God, now even a worm is sent to do God's will..... a worm eats through the vine and it dies and that, for Jonah, is the last straw.

He rants at God:
He said, "It is better for me to die than to live."
But God said to Jonah, "Is it right for you to be angry about the bush?"
And he said, "Yes, angry enough to die."
Then the LORD said, "You are concerned about the bush, for which you did not labor and which you did not grow; it came into being in a night and perished in a night.  And should I not be concerned about Nineveh, that great city, in which there are more than a hundred and twenty thousand persons who do not know their right hand from their left...?

When God asks Jonah, "Do you do well to be angry?"  Jonah doesn't even understand the question..... because, you see, anger can be its own logic.

Why wouldn't he be angry?

Angry at the Assyrians for their violent sins.  Angry at God for not destroying them.  Angry at the vine for dying and making him so uncomfortable..... angry enough to die.

You know the routine...... angry at illegal immigrants so that when you see signs in Spanish at the hardware store you are afraid that you are losing your country.  Angry at Muslims who raise terrorists and who have no remorse for their heinous deeds.  Angry at autoworkers for demanding salaries that put American businesses into bankruptcy.  Angry at bankers who helped to wreck the economy.  Angry at gay people for wanting the same rights as straight people.... How did our famous local defense attorney put it?  Dee Wampler said he was tired of these gay people shoving things down his throat..... is it possible that he can't hear himself?

It is not that Jonah and his people did not have a reason to be angry, ....it is not that Isis is not a terrorist army capable of sub-human acts of violence.  It is that our anger won't solve the problem.

The message of Jonah to the people who first read it was that their captivity in Babylon was over and it was time for them to stop hating and to accept the interracial marriages among them, the mixed blood Jews, the Jews who spoke other languages or who had family members who were of another religion.

We face those issues.  My father would never own a Japanese car because, for him, the score of Pearl Harbor wasn't over yet...... but if you take that perspective, it is never over.
The world isn't what it was and will never again be what it was.  There are more Muslims in the United States than there are Episcopalians or Presbyterians.  The economy of the Americas is blended and there will always be both English and Spanish speaking people in every state of the United States.... For ever!

Men and women, there are times when it is right to be angry.  But as Aristotle noted:
"Anyone can become angry - that is easy. But to be angry with the right person, to the right degree, at the right time, for the right purpose, and in the right way - that is not easy."

Our nation is trying to figure out how to untangle ourselves from a war which has already lasted longer than WWII.  And yet, we are still angry about and afraid of terrorists.

The book of Jonah asks, "Do you do well to be angry?".....  And should I not be concerned about Nineveh, that great city, in which there are more than a hundred and twenty thousand persons who do not know their right hand from their left...?

In years past we have invaded Mexico and Canada.  We have gone to war with England, France, Germany and Japan, all of which are now close allies and trading partners..... OK, not France really but still..... think of the wine and cheese.  It is possible for old enemies to become allies.  It is possible to find a way around the anger to something much more healthy..... not out of fear but out of courage....

Not in ignorant naiveté but in powerful faith.

Anger is almost always rooted in fear.  My modest suggestion is that our anger has led us into an eye for an eye mentality that has made our nation morally blind. I think that it is time for those who live in the land of the free and the home of the brave to stop being such cowards.  We will not fight our way to peace.

About Tolerance and Transcending Opinion

Proper 19    Sept 14, 2014
Community Christian Church of Springfield, MO
Dr. Roger Ray, pastor

Romans 14:1-10a
Welcome those who are weak in faith, but not for the purpose of quarreling over opinions. 2Some believe in eating anything, while the weak eat only vegetables. 3Those who eat must not despise those who abstain, and those who abstain must not pass judgment on those who eat; for God has welcomed them. 4Who are you to pass judgment on servants of another? It is before their own lord that they stand or fall. And they will be upheld, for the Lord is able to make them stand. 5Some judge one day to be better than another, while others judge all days to be alike. Let all be fully convinced in their own minds. 6Those who observe the day, observe it in honor of the Lord. Also those who eat, eat in honor of the Lord, since they give thanks to God; while those who abstain, abstain in honor of the Lord and give thanks to God. 7We do not live to ourselves, and we do not die to ourselves. 8If we live, we live to the Lord, and if we die, we die to the Lord; so then, whether we live or whether we die, we are the Lord's. 9For to this end Christ died and lived again, so that he might be Lord of both the dead and the living. 10Why do you pass judgment on your brother or sister? Or you, why do you despise your brother or sister?

Alexander Campbell, the Irish Presbyterian evangelist credited with being the brains of the Restoration movement in the 19th century.  Campbell's writing and preaching career gave birth to the Disciples of Christ, the Independent Christian Church and the Church of Christ.  He proclaimed an idealistic vision of Christian unity.  He said, "In essentials, unity; in non-essentials, liberty; in all things, charity."

Campbell believed that if only everyone would dispense with creeds, church doctrines and denominational affiliations, Christianity could be reunited..... Specifically, he thought that Christianity could be united once every rationally just agreed with his particular vision of what Christianity should be.  Predictably, he not only failed to unite the disparate sectarian divisions within Christianity, his movement managed to add three new deeply divided sects to the American religious landscape.

Still, his guiding principle is not a bad one:  In essential things, let's work towards agreement - In matters of personal opinion, let's be generous in allowing people the freedom to believe as they wish - and on both sides of that divide, let's be sure that nothing is more important that our decision to love one another.

It is a good principle, it is just that church folk had difficulty in agreeing on what was essential and what was a matter of opinion.  Before the movement had time to congeal into an easily recognized institution, the nation was divided by the cataclysmic Civil War, during which the Christian Church held their annual conferences just north of the Mason Dixon line in Cincinnati, OH.  At each of the war years' conferences, resolutions were passed asking God to damn the south.  At the meeting immediately following the end of the war, they passed a final resolution thanking God for having damned the south.

Religious history has some very embarrassing moments.....

In much more recent history, in the early 1990's, the Springfield Chamber of Commerce launched the fairly audacious project of enumerating community values to encourage churches and schools to teach to our citizens.  I was stunned that a club of local business owners could be so filled with self-importance that they would appoint themselves to assign sermon and lesson plan topics to both churches and schools but more than 20 years later, I have come to see such malignant narcissism as being rather more the status quo than shocking.

But, in the disheartening anthropology of ideas, a number of local churches managed to lower the moral bar by objecting to one of the values advocated by the Chamber of Commerce.... The word that tripped them up was:  tolerance.

Several local church leaders were afraid that "tolerance" was a code word for "no longer discriminating against homosexuals." Sadly, Chamber officials reassured them that they had no intentions of limiting their irrational prejudice against gay people but they were actually concerned about religious pluralism and racial prejudice..... which didn't really help matters.

I received a copy of a letter from the pastor of one of our large local Baptist Churches that informed me that if this list of words was accepted by our City Council that churches would then be forced to hire pedophiles to work in our church nurseries.  I was at a loss as to how to respond to such non-sense.... In the end, I corrected his spelling and grammar and just sent the letter back to him.  Surprisingly, I have not heard from him again.

Paul wrote to the church in Rome that they should all get along with one another and not try to force everyone else to agree with their personal opinions.  Evidently, Paul was not conscious of any possible hypocrisy involved in giving that advice.

I don't read Greek as well as Tarzan speaks English but if the English translation of his letter is true to the original, Paul wasn't even able to slightly disguise his own prejudice in a passage telling others not to be so opinionated.
Look at vs 1 in this pericope from Romans 14:  Welcome those who are "weak" in the faith....
Imagine a church that had several adult Sunday School classes.... On one door the class name reads:  for those who are weak in the faith.  On another there is a sign that says: for those who are strong in the faith.  You can bet that the class members in the "weak" class didn't pick their own name.  My college class in my home church named itself:  Lost and Found.... Which was accurate enough but even inside that class there would have been considerable disagreement about who was lost and who wasn't.

For Paul, the division was easy.  If you agreed with him, you were strong.  If you disagreed with him, you were weak.  Even still, he was saying that we should be nice about our prejudices....just as he gave us a perfect example of failing on that front in the way that he worded the passage.

Isaac Asimov, as a scientist, science fiction writer, and enthusiast for science education, received a lot of criticism from the religious world in the 60's and 70's and he was not reticent about pushing back.  He said:  "Anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that 'my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.'"


With that Asimov gets to the big challenge of tolerance.  If people have a right to their own opinion then they also have a right to be wrong.  That doesn't mean that an informed opinion has the same value as an uninformed opinion.  And, realistically, we can't be tolerant of views, beliefs, ethics, that somehow protect things that hurt other people.

The NFL has had to come to terms with the basic right and wrong of domestic abuse around the Ray Rice elevator video in which he hit his fiancé so hard that she went unconscious.  The Ravens originally suspended him for just two games.  The attitude being, domestic violence does not directly affect football so they could be kind of indifferent about it.  On the other hand, a player found guilty of smoking marijuana might face a year's suspension but then the NFL makes a lot of its advertising money on beer and liquor commercials.

It can cut into NFL income if players are using substances that compete with their advertised commercial products but beating up your spouse doesn't affect the bottom line. There are times when tolerance comes at too high a price.  Still, we need some unity on essentials while preserving liberty in non-essentials but we cannot deny that there are things that are essential and it is coming up with that list that proves to be so difficult.

One of the few public meetings in which I publicly raised my voice was about a decade ago at our local state university.  It was not a matter of a debate between an informed view and an uninformed view.
My message was delivered through gritted teeth to none other than the then president of the university.... A very smart man who held very passionately to a traditional Roman Catholic faith.  The president was adamantly refusing to include homosexuals in the list of protected persons in the university's non-discrimination policy.

It was just one of those times when I could say that there is no more room for debate.  As the song that Barry and Sean are going to perform for us in a moment says:  "This is not an opinion, I am right and you are wrong." I assured him that history would convict him as having been guilty of protecting prejudice over freedom.  Eventually, he chose to retire rather than change and the next president quickly changed the university policy.

You might say, in that case, that the university president was "weak" in his faith but his weakness kept dozens, if not hundreds, of gay university employees from having the same pension and insurance benefits as the straight members of the university's staff.  Can you meaningfully maintain unity with those whose beliefs come at the expense of the health and welfare of others?

When this controversy about tolerance first arose in our city, I delivered an impassioned sermon arguing that, in fact, tolerance is a religious value.

A retired religion professor who was typically quite kind and complimentary of my sermons, waited around until the line at the door at the end of the service had dissipated.

He approached me privately and said, "I don't usually disagree with you but this time you are wrong.  Tolerance is not a Christian value.... That falls far short of our goal.... Love is a Christian value."  The uncomfortable truth is that you can be so right that you are wrong.  You can be right in a way that gives you a casualty count rather than transformed hearts and minds.

There are times that it is incumbent upon a prophetic faith community to announce that there are beliefs, values, laws, economic practices, and even military actions and federal budgets that are just wrong.... We just need to find a way to do it that doesn't lead to alienation... which means that we have to find a way to be even more loving than we are right.

Care and Feeding of Community

Proper 18   Sept. 7, 2014
Community Christian Church of Springfield, MO
Dr. Roger Ray, Pastor

Romans 13:8-10
8Owe no one anything, except to love one another; for the one who loves another has fulfilled the law. 9The commandments, "You shall not commit adultery; You shall not murder; You shall not steal; You shall not covet"; and any other commandment, are summed up in this word, "Love your neighbor as yourself." 10Love does no wrong to a neighbor; therefore, love is the fulfilling of the law.

At the entrance to the Buddhist Temple in Kansas City where I spoke on Friday evening there is a large open book. The book has only one word on its pages and that word is "love."  People who seek out a Buddhist community in Missouri are often the same sort of people who seek out a Progressive congregation or who go to Unitarian or Unity churches.

They are people who are wounded.  They are refugees from abusive religions that were marked by guilt and fear, judgment, manipulation, and threats. To at least symbolically imply with this one-word book, that love is the entire content of their sacred texts is a comforting and reassuring symbol.

In talking with Nima, the Buddhist nun who is that pastor in that faith community, we realized that while we both essentially have a ministry of welcoming and trying to love the wounded into health, that we also both see a lot of coming and going in our membership.

There is a very important proverb in the 12 step recovery movement that says, "Hurt people, hurt people."  I am often shocked by how often the most wounded people will demand love and acceptance but respond to being given love and acceptance with criticism and hostility.

I learned that lesson very vividly at a very young age when my friends and I heard tires squeal and a dog yelp.  We ran to see which of our pets had been injured and it was the very much beloved dog of my next-door neighbor.  The dog was seriously injured but alive.  We wanted to help, wanted to pick the dog up and take it to the vet, but when we got close, he bared his teeth and menacingly snapped at us.  We had the solution to his pain available to us, we might have saved him, but his pain made him so hostile that we were powerless to be of any aid.

Hurt people, hurt people.  They do it unconsciously.  Often unintentionally and they will create a narrative around it in which they can describe the people who tried to help as if they were their tormentors.

We say that God is love.  We sing that love is our religion.  We insist that we can reject dogmas, creeds, even sacred texts because love is the path, love is the point, love is the goal of our spiritual lives.... That all sounds great and it is nearly impossible to implement.

Though I do not believe that the resurrection accounts in the gospels should be taken literally, one of the most important symbolic messages present in the very metaphorical accounts is the fact that the resurrected Jesus was, in Luke's and John's accounts, resurrected with the nail and spear wounds of the crucifixion still visible.

Your wounds, your failures, your defeats are a part of you.   You can heal, you can start over, you can experience resurrection in your life but you don't start over without a limp and a few scars.

Last month, at our conference with Bishop Spong, the most fascinating woman I have ever met drove up from Dallas to attend.  The two of us realized both a common attraction and a host of common interests and so we are, I'm very happy to say, in the midst of a life changing romance.

But I am 58 years old.  I've been single for a generation and have had more failed dating relationships than I care to remember.  So, I asked Heather if we could just avoid talking about our past relationships for a while.  I'm not trying to hide anything but I didn't want to carry any old baggage into a new relationship.  I wanted to give the two of us space to figure out who we are as a couple before the room gets too crowded with the ghosts of all the people who had been unsuccessful contestants in the past.

I still think that was a good suggestion, as a method, but what we have discovered in hours and hours of phone conversations is that it is nearly impossible to say who I am, what my hopes are, what my image of love, marriage, family life is without some accounting of just how I got all of the bullet holes and knife scars that still show in my resurrected life.

No matter how much you want to put the past behind you, there are hot buttons, emotional tender spots that are a part of us. Heather, as I feel compelled to remind her at times, wasted several years of her life dating lesser men and now that she has traded up, there are a lot of things that she can just let go of.

I have had to realize that even though I consider myself to be very progressive and to have very egalitarian views about gender roles, that some of my past experiences have left me with some anger that sometimes comes out in the form of humor that isn't, in the final analysis, all that funny.  This has not been a comfortable realization for me but I can see it and I don't want it but these shadows lurk about in our psyche.

We want to connect with people.  We want to have friends.  We want to experience community, but the fact is that once you are out of the sandbox, life happens and we end up with some tough scars.

It was inaccurately attributed to Meryl Streep but it is actually a kind of declaration made by the author, José Micard Teixeira. It is simultaneously liberating and guilt provoking.... He says, in part:

"I no longer have patience for certain things, not because I've become arrogant, but simply because I reached a point in my life where I do not want to waste more time with what displeases me or hurts me. I lost the will to please those who do not like me, to love those who do not love me and to smile at those who do not want to smile at me. I no longer spend a single minute on those who lie or want to manipulate. I decided not to coexist anymore with pretense, hypocrisy, dishonesty and cheap praise. In friendship I dislike the lack of loyalty and betrayal. I do not get along with those who do not know how to give a compliment or a word of encouragement. And on top of everything I have no patience for anyone who does not deserve my patience." 

I have no idea how old that Teixeira is, but I can sympathize with his unwillingness to waste anymore precious time in life on relationships that mimic love but are not, in fact, loving.  I'm uncomfortable with the suggestion that so many people are expendable.... People should never be regarded as something to simply dispose of but you lock your car doors in public parking places and you lock your doors and windows in your home to keep people from stealing your things .... So what sense does it make for  us to allow emotional thieves to take our days, our weeks..... to take our joy... to steal from us the opportunity to experience real friendship, intimate family affection and true love?

What I am personally realizing is that clearing the emotional clutter out of my life is not so much a matter of saying that I have lost patience with those who take away our real love relationships but rather that I have to get rid of the things in me that keep people at a distance, that make it hard to be in a close friendship with me.

We do have to protect ourselves from emotional bank robbers but we also have to stop polluting our own emotional environment.  I like most of Teixeira's declaration, I just think that we need to look in a mirror and say it to ourselves before we step to our front door and say it to the world.

Love is our religion.  Love is the only word we need in our sacred text.  Love is our healing, our path and our goal and every step we take that is defined by dishonesty, manipulation, revenge, resentment, competition, judgment, and intolerance is a step in the wrong direction.

I don't want you to be rejected or to feel guilt.  I just want for myself and I want for you to be better at loving.

You learn to ride a bicycle by riding a bicycle.  You learn to sing by singing. You learn to love by loving.

I would say more about that but I am kind of eager to get on the road to Dallas right now.

Why Are We Still Having to Fight for Workers' Rights?

Labor Day Message   August 31, 2014
Community Christian Church
Roger Ray, pastor

Deuteronomy 24:14-15
14You shall not withhold the wages of poor and needy laborers, whether other Israelites or aliens who reside in your land in one of your towns. 15You shall pay them their wages daily before sunset, because they are poor and their livelihood depends on them; otherwise they might cry to the Lord against you, and you would incur guilt.

It is not my goal to be partisan.  When we first started this church, just three months before the history making 2008 election, we actually had several of the leaders of the Greene Co. Democratic Party in our church.  I celebrated the election of our nation's first black president with as much enthusiasm as anyone else at the watch party.  I was a huge fan of our Democratic senator, Claire McCaskill.

Prior to that time I had been regularly contacted by officials in the Democratic Party trying to recruit me to run for various elected offices because, for a generation, I had been writing opinion columns in the Springfield News-Leader that took our elected officials to task for illegal wars, cuts to education and poverty programs, environmental degradation, and for misogynistic and homophobic policies.

However, when we had prominent Democrats in the White House and the Senate and I was critical of them for illegal wars, undermining education and poverty programs, failing to defend the environment, and for tacitly supporting misogynistic and homophobic policies, I stopped hearing from the local and state Democratic Party.  Many of those Democratic loyalist members of the church left and left so angry that I can sometimes clear out several tables in the coffee shops where liberals hang out just by walking in the room.
Missouri's favorite son, President Harry Truman, was often called "Give-em Hell Harry" but Truman objected, saying, "I never really gave em hell, I just told the truth and they thought it was hell."

But what I find the most interesting and simultaneously the most disappointing is how the issues that Harry Truman was so adamant about nearly 70 years ago as he ran for re-election are so very current as to make one despair about our ability to make progress.

This is a longer quote than I typically use in the pulpit but indulge me for a moment to share a piece of one of Truman's campaign speeches and where he uses the words "Republican Party" try to translate that as "elected officials" because there is not much of merit on either side of the political fence.  He said:

Well, I have been studying the Republican Party (let's just say "politicians")  for over 12 years at close hand in the Capital of the United States. And by this time, I have discovered where the Republicans stand on most of the major issues.Since they won't tell you themselves, I am going to tell you.They approve of the American farmer-but they are willing to help him go broke.They stand four-square for the American home--but not for housing.They are strong for labor--but they are stronger for restricting labor's rights.They favor a minimum wage--the smaller the minimum the better.They indorse educational opportunity for all--but they won't spend money for teachers or for schools.They think modern medical care and hospitals are fine--for people who can afford them.They approve of social security benefits-so much so that they took them away from almost a million people.They believe in international trade--so much so that they crippled our reciprocal trade program, and killed our International Wheat Agreement.They favor the admission of displaced persons--but only within shameful racial and religious limitations.They consider electric power a great blessing-but only when the private power companies get their rake-off.They say TVA is wonderful--but we ought never to try it again.They condemn "cruelly high prices"--but fight to the death every effort to bring them down.They think the American standard of living is a fine thing--so long as it doesn't spread to all the people.And they admire the Government of the United States so much that they would like to buy it.

If the president of the United States could state the hypocritical nature of the economic divide so clearly, and he could state it in a democracy where the masses who are the victims of this economic inequality can vote, how is it that nothing seems to have changed?

John Maynard Keynes succinctly describes the problem this way, he said: Capitalism is the astounding belief that the most wickedest of men will do the most wickedest of things for the greatest good of everyone.


It is difficult to motivate productive work, innovation, invention, or denial of any immediate personal fulfillment in the absence of a promise of some personal reward.  Capitalism holds out the promise that if you will work hard, delay gratification, and save that you will reap a wonderful reward of economic security if not wealth, and comfort if not luxury.

The problem is that when the American Dream becomes American Wishful Thinking, when hard work, delaying gratification, and saving doesn't allow you to retire with dignity, have access to health care or to ever own a home, then the promise of capitalism becomes a lie.  With the right rules in place, capitalism and its rewards inspired invention, innovation, hard work and it produced the strongest middle class in the history of the world.

But when we vilify teachers and police and auto-workers, all labor unions, for insisting on a living wage and a pension that let's a person buy Bermuda shorts, black knee socks and sandals that they can wear around the retirement home in Florida where they can criticize the government full-time, then capitalism is no longer a gift, it is a lie and a curse.

The late Jewish Croatian economist, Branko Horvat stated: ... it is now well known that capitalist development leads to the concentration of capital, employment and power. It is somewhat less known that it leads to the almost complete destruction of economic freedom.


Everyone who has ever played the old board game, Monopoly, has a basic understanding of unbridled capitalism. If you keep rolling the dice and moving through life in a capitalist system, eventually one person ends up with all of the land and money and everyone else is out of the game.

You can change the rules so that all of the players have a chance to get back into the game, rules that keep one player from quickly acquiring all of the land, utilities and infrastructure.  In truth, our nation has been up and down that rollercoaster a few times in our 240 year history.

In our earliest days, Thomas Jefferson, one of the primary architects of the nation, said "I hope we shall crush ... in its birth the aristocracy of our moneyed corporations, which dare already to challenge our government to a trial of strength and bid defiance to the laws of our country".

The most wicked of men will not, of their own accord do what is right for the poor, the laborers.  It was not natural market forces that brought slavery to an end.  It was not the invisible hand of the market that ended child labor.  It was not the competition of the marketplace that made the workplaces more safe, that gave us the modern invention of the weekend, the 40 hour work week, paid vacations or sick leave.

It was organized labor working in conjunction with spiritual leaders and visionary politicians.  When things go a little too well for a little too long, the unions become weak, the church becomes irrelevant and politicians are sold to the highest bidder.

Franklin Roosevelt, who had to rally America to respond to Facism, Nazism, Communism, and nationalism, also found the time and energy to warn the Congress of the United States that their constant caving into corporate power threatened to bring America as a free nation to an end.  He said, on April 29, 1938:
 [T]he liberty of a democracy is not safe if the people tolerate the growth of private power to a point where it becomes stronger than their democratic state itself. That, in its essence, is fascism -- ownership of government by an individual, by a group, or by any other controlling private power.

I am currently perplexed by the involvement of someone who has seemed to be an advocate for a more fair tax system, Warren Buffett, in the proposed move of Burger King's headquarters to Canada to avoid paying corporate taxes in the USA.  The media in concert with corporations has given this process the benign sounding name of "inversion." Inversion sounds much nicer than bank robbery doesn't it?

For there to be a functioning democracy where people can buy Whoppers and fries, there have to be paved roads, water and electric lines, police and firemen, schools, hospitals, and airports.  Corporations love to harvest in the fertile fields of the American economy but they don't want to pay their fair share of the taxes that plow the fields and plant.

When Walgreens wanted to jump through the tax loophole called "inversion" an angry public pointed out that the majority of their income derives directly from government supported prescription payments.

They realized that their lack of patriotism was going to cost them a lot of customers and even though they backed down and stayed here, the fact that they wanted to take their money to Ireland has made me drive past Walgreens several times and I'm not seeing that trend changing anytime soon.

For all of the screaming corporations do about American taxes, the larger companies have already influenced the writing of tax codes to get their effective rate down to nearly 0%.  You don't think that the lobbyists for Burger King hamburger and French fry cooks wrote those tax codes do you?

One of our long time listeners is an American ex-pat living in Scotland.  Robyn recently wrote to ask me who it was that always yells "amen" at the end of my sermons.  She went so far as to say that sometimes my sermons make her feel depressed but she always hangs on to hear Rev. Mel shout "amen" because that always makes her feel good.

I never get tired of telling people about my friend, Rev. Mel Miller who has spent his life fighting for social and economic justice, fighting against racism, warfare and prejudice.  But I told her, Mel is 90 now and not getting around as well as he used to.  And she opined, that it was going to be horrible to lose that voice when he is gone.

I thought about it for a moment and tried to imagine what church will be like when Mel isn't able to be here and I just felt, I felt it deep inside, that the first day Mel can't come that probably everyone left here would yell amen in his honor.

Mel has spent a lot of his life as a lone voice calling for school integration, housing for the poor, justice for American Indians, and support for poor farmers.  I've felt pretty isolated here in southern Missouri, performing weddings for same sex couples, fighting corporations, hospitals and churches that abuse the vulnerable.

But if it is just me bloviating about progressive religion and Mel shouting Amen then we are a pretty silly pair of preachers.  Corporations have as their mission statement that they are going to pay a dividend to their shareholders.  Politicians have as their unstated mission to be re-elected by any means necessary.

What stands between the corporations and the government and all of the people who have no voice, who are too poor to have a lobbyist or to have politicians come courting their donations?  You and me.  Just you and just me.

We are the prophets now.  We are Isaiah, Moses, Jeremiah, and Amos.  We are the ones who will demand that workers be given a living wage.  We are the ones that will insist that laborers who build houses get to live in one that they own.  We are the ones who will defend the immigrant farmer, the child growing up in urban blight in underfunded schools.

We are the ones who will prevent our economically disadvantaged young men and women from being recruited to go die in a war for oil and military spending.

How can we defend justice against the combined power of corporations and government.  Ah, my friends, you defend justice the same way you defend a lion..... you let it out of the cage.  You talk about it, you don't give up, you shout amen until you are hoarse.

Old king Pharaoh, "let my people go."  And Burger King, if you don't love the poor people who eat your crummy food enough to help pay for their schools, health care, and housing then you can go but you won't be taking my dollars with you.

Walgreens, you want to give advice to seniors about which Medicare prescription benefit to choose?  Alright, but I will advise those seniors to take their prescriptions to locally owned pharmacies who are not trying to rob this nation of its future.

It is not teacher and police pensions that are threatening this nation's economy.  There are no teachers with off shore accounts and apartments in Paris.  Business owners may cry out against the minimum wage being raised so something slightly better than slavery but look, if everybody went to an Ivy League college and got a Phd somebody would still have to nail shingles to roofs, make pizzas and milk cows..... at some point we have to acknowledge that the people who make like possible are people who deserve to have their lives made possible.

What I know for sure is that the corporations and the government will never get this right until you tell them and tell them often enough and loudly enough that they can't pretend that they don't hear you.

Well, I guess that's what I've got to say.  Now, what do you have to say?

The Path to Centering Spirituality

August 24, 2014
Community Christian Church of Springfield, MO
Roger Ray, pastor

In the same way I saw an ancient path, an ancient road, traveled by the Rightly Self-awakened Ones of former times. And what is that ancient path, that ancient road, traveled by the Rightly Self-awakened Ones of former times? Just this noble eightfold path: right view, right aspiration, right speech, right action, right livelihood, right effort, right mindfulness, right concentration...I followed that path.
--Nagara Sutta

Henry Davis of Ferguson, Missouri had the misfortune of being a black man with the very ordinary name of Henry Davis.  It was a misfortune because there was another black man named Henry Davis who was suspected of having committed a crime in St. Louis Co.

When Henry Davis was arrested in the fall of 2009 he was taken to the police department where they discovered that this Henry Davis had a different middle name and a different social security number than the Henry Davis they were looking for.  They decided to hold him overnight anyway.

When they tried to put him into a one bed holding cell that already had an occupant, he objected.  When he objected, five officers took him out of the cell and beat him severely.  All of this is absurdly incompetent, violent and inexcusable but that's not why I am telling you Henry Davis' story this morning.  It is what happened next that makes me want to talk about this in relation to the first step of the eight fold path of traditional Buddhism.

When Henry Davis was arrested he was just a welder living in Ferguson, MO who had not been charged with any crime.

After his false arrest and completely unethical beating at the hands of the Ferguson police.... he was charged with property damage because.... Wait for it.... Wait for it.... It appears that Henry Davis, while being beaten, got some of his blood on the uniforms of the officers who were beating him.
http://rt.com/usa/180680-ferguson-henry-davis-blood/

Now, standing here in a pulpit that is 200 miles removed from Ferguson, MO and five years removed from the incident, it is clear to us that this was just nuts.... This wasn't simply abuse of authority or even extreme police brutality.... This was crazy.

It is obvious to us but it wasn't obvious to them.  Prejudice, as you have heard me say before, has its own logic. Absent the kind of mindfulness, the kind of dedication to reality, absent the courage of self criticism, prejudice becomes a short hand form of logic that interprets everything around your own comfort, convenience and profit.

The police had made a mistake.  They complicated that mistake with a violent crime against an innocent citizen.  And in order to not face charges themselves, they created an embarrassing charge against their victim. This, I assure you, happens in less bloody and extreme ways in interactions between human beings all of the time.

In his famous and still very helpful book, Scott Peck writes in the first section of The Road Less Traveled, that there are four tools of discipline necessary to lead a sane and happy life.  They are:

1. Delaying gratification
2. Acceptance of responsibility
3. Dedication to truth
4. Balance

I would personally put them in a different order but Peck was certainly influenced by Buddhist thought in this list.  It seems to me that in our day the third one, dedication to truth or reality, is more urgent.  Thirty years ago when this book was first published, we did not yet have 24 hour news networks and newspapers employed actual journalists.  In our day, where propaganda and prejudice pass for news, the public is increasingly distanced from a healthy orientation to reality.

We will insist that something is true because we want it to be true.  The general public still thinks that Obamacare is bad but if you ask them if affordable health care is good, if you ask them if they think that insurance companies should not exclude pre-existing conditions from coverage, or that insurance companies shouldn't be able to cancel your coverage because you are sick, then the overwhelming majority of citizens favor every aspect of Obamacare, they just don't like that policy that that black man came up with.

In fact, in some polling, we see that the majority of Americans approve of the Affordable Healthcare Act while still opposing Obamacare because they don't know that they are the same thing.  At a certain level, that is just a matter of being uniformed.  But there is a difference between ignorance and willful ignorance.

To quote Scott Peck again, one of the most useful definitions of evil is just that:  willful ignorance.  Being stupid is not a crime but denying reality and willfully ignoring facts is, if not evil, it is certainly the gateway to evil.  It is this disengagement from reality that allows for racism and misogyny to continue to exist.  A failure to have this "right view" that the Buddha taught allowed us to ignore readily available evidence and to engage in a lethal, bankrupting, and decade long war in Iraq, leaving behind billions in assets and weapons for an army of terrorists to become a nightmare for the people of Syria and Iraq.

But, to be completely honest, we have to acknowledge that religion has played a role in this as well.  We teach impressionable children to force themselves to believe in angels, demons, souls, in heaven and hell, and all manner of reality denying magical thinking and then we are surprised when they don't vote or act rationally in matters of great importance.

Progressive faith asks us to invest ourselves in evidence.  The Buddhist faith has always insisted that the spiritual path is devoted to reality in a right view, right speech, right action, and even a right occupation.

Prejudice and even traditional religion asks us to believe without evidence or even to believe in spite of contrary evidence.  The eightfold path calls for mindfulness, concentration, it asks us to be aware, focused, informed and caring.

We come into the world as screaming narcissists.  There is nothing wrong with that.... That's how babies survive.  But we expect them to grow up.  Within a few months we want them to be able to hold their own bottles and then to feed themselves.  We expect them to learn to control their bodily functions and their emotional outbursts.

When they get to be a few years old, we expect them to learn to tell the difference between a cartoon and reality, between imagination and experience.  Eventually, they need to be able to figure out for themselves that there are no monsters under the bed and that their bad dreams are just bad dreams but not bad realities.

Somehow we have not expected the church to grow up.  We have allowed the church to confuse imagination with reality, to invest bad dreams with waking reality and to fail to come to terms with the real spiritiual challenges that face us.

We can all by sympathetic with a child who is afraid of the dark.  My modest proposal is that we no longer tolerate an adult religion that is afraid of the light.

We choose to follow a path that is devoted to reality, that struggles to say the right things, do the right things, to concentrate, focus, to balance the personal good with the social good, to follow a spiritual path that not only heals our own lives but offers the hope of substantive salvation to the world.

Offending the Pious

Proper  15       August 17, 2014
Community Christian Church
Roger Ray, pastor

Matthew 15: 10-18
10Then he called the crowd to him and said to them, "Listen and understand: 11it is not what goes into the mouth that defiles a person, but it is what comes out of the mouth that defiles." 12Then the disciples approached and said to him, "Do you know that the Pharisees took offense when they heard what you said?" 13He answered, "Every plant that my heavenly Father has not planted will be uprooted. 14Let them alone; they are blind guides of the blind. And if one blind person guides another, both will fall into a pit." 15But Peter said to him, "Explain this parable to us." 16Then he said, "Are you also still without understanding? 17Do you not see that whatever goes into the mouth enters the stomach, and goes out into the sewer? 18But what comes out of the mouth proceeds from the heart, and this is what defiles.

Like most of you, I grew up going to church, though I doubt that many of you would have gone as often as I did.... I'm talking perfect attendance.  Even on my "stay out all night" senior prom night, my dad met me in the garage as I was taking off my coat and bow tie after a night of being "all grown up," and said, "Keep your coat on son, if you are man enough to stay out all night, you are man enough to sit up in church for a couple of hours."

I didn't think that I was man enough, but it turns out that I was.  But even with perfect church attendance, church turns out to give you a little bite of religion every week.  I had regular doses of Jesus in Sunday School and in church all of my life, but it wasn't until about 20 years ago, when I was asked to teach a college course on the "Life and Teachings of Jesus" that I had to step back and try to see the big picture.

In church you read a passage here, a passage there, you talk about what that might mean and what this might mean but I had never asked myself, "What was the primary point of Jesus' teaching?"  "Why was Jesus important?  Different?  Noteworthy? Why do we still care what he said?"

I'm indebted to Marcus Borg's little book, "Meeting Jesus Again (for the first time)" for giving me a big picture context.

Borg points out that the primary message of Jesus is a message of radical compassion and the primary conflict in the gospels is the conflict of the message of radical compassion against the prevailing religion of purity or piety.  You can see it in our reading from Matthew 15 today.  Jesus is saying that all of the obsession about kosher laws, of things you can't touch and things you can eat are absurd. He even rather graphically says that everything you eat simply pass through your body and becomes sewage.

What really matters is not what goes into you but what comes out of your heart, your mind, your mouth.

It is important to see that this is not a matter of Christianity verses Judaism or Jesus against the Jews. This is a conflict between worldviews.  There is, I might dare to say, a great deal more piety in traditional Christianity than there ever was in ancient Judaism.

You have often heard me stress that the practice of a healthy spirituality has to do with behaviors rather than beliefs.  In that sense, piety can masquerade as healthy spirituality because it does stress behaviors... the problem is that there is no compassion in piety.... It is all narcissistic, it is all about keeping oneself unstained by the world, pure enough to be acceptable to God.

If someone says, "I'm having impure thoughts," we tend to think immediately of sex... as if sex were ipso facto impure or somehow defiling.

Which is more impure: the decision to be intimate with your significant other or the decision to spend all of your money on yourself rather than to help the poor?  Which is more impure: watching an R rated movie or keeping your employee's salary down so low that they can't live on their wages?

Traditional religion, whether it is Jewish, Christian, or Muslim, has expended huge amounts of energy on the containment of private sexual thoughts and actions, blended with obsessive concerns with alcohol, drugs, and certain foods, while waging insane wars, creating an economic system that serves the rich and impoverishes the majority.

The United States has the highest rate of childhood poverty in the world.  Poverty tends to lead to crime.  Piety says that we need to build more prisons in which we can punish the impure.  Compassion says that we invest in our children, giving them decent housing, access to health care, and good schools.

Consider how the tragic murder of Michael Brown in Ferguson, MO has unfolded in civil strife in this past week.  An unarmed man, holding his hands in the air, was killed by a small town policeman.  There is little doubt that Michael Brown was not innocent of aggressive behaviors but there is no plausible defense for the lethal force used on him by that policeman.

The public responded with outrage and, at least a part of the public, let their outrage turn into looting and arson.

The initial police response to protest, looting and arson was to roll out armored military vehicles and to have police in full military battle gear, aim weapons at a public already enraged by excessive violence on the part of the police.

A more compassionate response by the state police, once they were put in charge of the situation, saw the officer in charge marching with the protestors, sympathizing, understanding, affirming their cries for justice.  Piety can enforce order but compassion can heal.

The movement from looting and burning towards peaceful demonstration was halted, of course, when the police released video from a convenience store security camera that appeared to show Michael Brown stealing some cheap cigars without releasing any details of the shooting of Michael Brown.

You see, the official pious technique was simply to display Michael Brown as a large, menacing, black man engaged in petty theft... as if to say, "Well, of course, he was asking to be shot."  Piety seeks to diminish a person's worth to the point that you don't have to see them as being human.

Do you remember in the early years of our awareness of AIDS that people, even on network news, would talk about the innocent victims of AIDS... and by innocent they meant people who contracted the HIV virus through a blood transfusion or an accidental needle prick in a hospital room.  Which meant that anyone who contracted AIDS by having sex with an infected person was then deserving of a fatal illness.

Even my puritanical mother would not have suggested that sexual conduct was cause for execution! ... exile maybe, but not death!

The piety system cannot hold a candle to radical compassion.  So the tension in the gospels was that Jesus' teaching about compassion flew in the face of organized religion... of the government.... The police.... The banking system.... The enforcement of wealth for some and poverty for others.  So, they killed him.

It is no longer common to crucify people who defy the piety system but in Ferguson, MO they are doing what they can.... They are arresting journalists for covering the police actions.  I want to say this very clearly for all of you and for all of our American audience and I hope the same is true in most countries, but it is legal in all 50 states for you to take out your phones and video the police at work.  In fact, video cameras have been proven to prevent police violence.

In Rialto, California, the city required every member of their police force to wear a camera while on duty and they discovered a dramatic reduction in the number of times that their officers used their batons, tasers, tear gas or guns.  They have had a 90% reduction in complaints against the police.

As much as I despise the NSA's spying on American citizens and foreign governmental officials, there are times when having cameras turned on can help them to remember their humanity.

H. Jackson Brown famously said that "Character is what you do when you think no one is watching."  That may be true, but even if they are only pretending to have character, I think we need to help our overly militarized police forces to remember that they are here to protect and serve, not to harass and shoot.

Talking about radical compassion offends the pious.  To quiet the prophets of the gospel, they will threaten, ridicule, sometimes arrest and pepper spray and sometimes they will even shoot.  But it was a message that Jesus of Nazareth thought it was worth dying to teach and I am convinced that it is certainly a message that is worth living for.

A Prophet in Hiding

Proper 14    August 10, 2014
Community Christian Church of Springfield
Roger Ray, pastor

1 Kings 19:9-14
9At that place he came to a cave, and spent the night there. Then the word of the Lord came to him, saying, "What are you doing here, Elijah?" 10He answered, "I have been very zealous for the Lord, the God of hosts; for the Israelites have forsaken your covenant, thrown down your altars, and killed your prophets with the sword. I alone am left, and they are seeking my life, to take it away." 11He said, "Go out and stand on the mountain before the Lord, for the Lord is about to pass by." Now there was a great wind, so strong that it was splitting mountains and breaking rocks in pieces before the Lord, but the Lord was not in the wind; and after the wind an earthquake, but the Lord was not in the earthquake; 12and after the earthquake a fire, but the Lord was not in the fire; and after the fire a sound of sheer silence.13When Elijah heard it, he wrapped his face in his mantle and went out and stood at the entrance of the cave. Then there came a voice to him that said, "What are you doing here, Elijah?" 14He answered, "I have been very zealous for the Lord, the God of hosts; for the Israelites have forsaken your covenant, thrown down your altars, and killed your prophets with the sword. I alone am left, and they are seeking my life, to take it away." 

I have a long treasured fantasy.  Probably nothing I have to say now could possibly live up to your expectations but it is my fantasy, not yours.  Mine is a fantasy that was born in the final months of my tenure as the senior pastor of a large denominational church... when I had to take medications to calm my stomach and others to cope with the political insanity of my circumstances.

I bought a lottery ticket every Saturday afternoon and I would stop at a store and check it on my way to church on Sunday to see if I had won, literally to see if I could "call in rich."  In those days I dreamed having enough money to buy a Starbucks on the coast of Florida where I could change my name and just stand behind the counter and make cappuccino drinks all day and officially stop trying to care about what happened in the news or to the church.

I never won the lottery but I did find myself unemployed and investigating the purchase of a Starbucks only to learn that Starbucks doesn't sell franchises.  All of their stores are company owned.

Returning to pastoral life was not a straight line and when life gets a bit more challenging than I think that I want to continue to bear, I return to my fantasy of what I call my own personal "Elijah moment."  I am sorry to be speaking so personally this morning but I can't help but think about my Starbucks fantasy whenever this Elijah story comes around in the lectionary.

We read just a bit of it this morning but let me remind you of the larger context.  King Ahab, the king of Judah, had married a queen from a neighboring kingdom who was determined to replace the worship of the Jewish God, Yahweh, with her own native religion.  Jezebel was a determined evangelist for Baal, killing those who would not comply by converting.

Elijah has a great show down with the priests of Baal.  It was a red-letter day for Elijah who succeeded in calling down fire from heaven and then personally slaying the priests of Baal with a sword.  Ecumenical relationships were at a low ebb at that time.

Jezebel then threatens to kill Elijah and even though he had proven himself to be a friend of God and pretty handy with a sword, he was horrified and he ran into the wilderness to hide.  He hid in a cave and prayed that God would simply take his life.

Now, of course, this story is full of hero-worshipping exaggeration but the core narrative tells a tale that I can certainly relate to and I suspect that most of you can too.

He didn't run and hide because he no longer had the strength to stand up for the faith he had defended.  He didn't go into hiding because he was afraid of one woman, even though she was a queen.  He went into hiding because he didn't believe that he had any friends.

Elijah was a powerful prophet, certain of his convictions and unafraid of his enemies but, as you see it in the beginning of this pericope we have from I Kings 19 today:  The Lord calls to Elijah who is hiding in the back of a cave, "Why are you hiding?"  And Elijah answers, "I've been so zealous for the truth, I've worked so hard, but everyone else has just given up and given in... they have forsaken the message, accepted the religion of the government.. and," Elijah says, "I, I alone, am left."

You know how a shy child will sometimes just pull his shirt tail up over his head so that, well, so that no one could see him though the truth of the matter is that everyone can still see him, he just can't see anybody.  It is one of those things that children do that adults aren't supposed to do but the text says that Elijah did, he pulled his mantle up over his head..... which doesn't look very mature.... But it does look sadly desperate.... Depressed... hopeless.

In the months that have passed since my newspaper column ended, my mail has changed pretty dramatically.  The mail that I received in response to my News-Leaders articles were mostly very negative and some were even threatening.  But the mail I receive in response to our YouTube and iTunes listeners is typically very positive.  Of course, that is a self selected audience and the newspaper is a general circulation publication so people who don't like my stuff on line will usually just go away. ... but not always.

I get an occasional letter from a fundamentalist who is praying for me, telling me that I need to believe in God's word and in Jesus Christ.... I don't pay any attention to those.  But when I do get a negative response, it is usually pretty forceful, usually a bit too personal, and it sounds like it was written from the mouth of a cave in the wilderness by someone who feels abandoned and desperate.

One of our listeners, Tony Khoshaba, and Iraqi Christian, wrote to ask me why no progressive Christians are talking about the slaughter of Christians in Syria and in Iraq by the Isis extremists. I replied, frankly, that though I and others address current social justice issues that we are not a news service.  While I try to take a wide angle view of social issues, I am disciplined about exposing myself to a lot of non-corporate international news... I still cannot say that I am comprehensively educated in current events.

Tony, though the plight of your people, the Yazidis, is dire, and I know that hundreds have been murdered and thousands are stranded in the mountains without food and water, and I affirm that very little media attention is being given to this emergency, I do want you to know that we are not indifferent to your plight.  The Yazidis, which means, "children of the son," have lived in Christian community in Iraq and Syria from the days of the apostles themselves.

Since the rise of Islam, I know that you must feel much like Elijah, where everyone has abandoned the faith, turned to the majority religion and now, under the Iraqi banner which reads, There is no God but Allah, your people are being hunted down and killed.

There have been demonstrations in major cities on both the east and the west coast of the United States, sometimes drawing out thousands of desperate people who have fled from the Middle East for the safety of the United States, but the TV cameras don't show up and no one seems to hear your cries.

I hear your anger and I can bear the fact that you are angry even very specifically at me.  Still, there is nothing that I can do to change the policies of the governments of Iraq, Syria or even the United States, but I can tell you that you are not alone.

The only reassurance that Elijah gets is that he is not alone.  He is still in a tiny minority, but he is not all alone.

But there is something more I would like to add for Tony, for myself, for any of you who feel like pulling your shirt over your head, getting a meaningless job and officially checking out of society.

In his book, The Impossible Will Take a While, Howard Zinn writes:

Consider the remarkable transformation, in just a few decades, in people's consciousness of racism, in the bold presence of women demanding their rightful place, in a growing public awareness that gays are not curiosities but sensate human beings, in the long term growing skepticism about military intervention despite brief surges of military madness.

It is that long-term change that I think we must see if we are not to lose hope. Pessimism becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy; it reproduces itself by crippling our willingness to act. 

We have been successful on many fronts, even when the success is far too slow.  And I realize that 200,000 refugees in the mountains of Iraq do not have time to wait for water, food, and protection from an army of terrorists, I don't want to be dismissive of that in any way.  Still, the larger issue is the historical cessation of war.... The issue is that we have to stop creating more refugees, moving national boundaries by force and allowing regional civil strife to become genocide.

If we are ever going to do that, we have to get out of the cave, we have to find each other.  You don't have to be friendless or isolated.

Pull your shirt down off of your face, go find your tribe and make your tribe strong enough for your voice to be heard.  Isolation is the same thing as surrender and we are not the kind of people who give up.